On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:05 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wrote down the possible options and their pros and cons and I done my best to catch all the feedback here. Thanks. Another idea occurred to me, similar to "D" (use alternatives) and incorporates "A" (delete the current epel-8) for their to be something such as having a "mock-config-epel-default-base-rhel" and "mock-config-epel-default-base-alma" and "mock-config-epel-default-base-rocky" rpms (or whatever the agreed upon names would be) that would create the (raw?) epel-8 symlink, and conflict with each other. Then one is left discussing which of the various "Suggests: " or "Enhances: " specifiers would be appropriate and under what circumstances, perhaps such as a Suggests: (....base-alma if alma-release), and a Suggests: (...base-rocky if rocky-release) ??? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
