Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Mock/Copr default epel-8-* configuration to be changed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:55 AM Carl George <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 22. 11. 21 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> > >    OK as well, though [2])
> >
> > I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers.
> >
> > Getting and configuring the subscription was always so unfriendly for me that
> > I've been using EPEL mocks even for my RHEL work. This basically means using
> > EPEL mocks will once again be as complicated as using RHEL.
> >
> > However, enough of my personal views. Since we have not used RHEL for copr/mock
> > EPEL buidlroots until now, but we used a downstream freely-available RHEL-copy
> > (CentOS Linux), could we not continue doing so by using e.g. AlmaLinux?
> >
> > --
> > Miro Hrončok
> > --
> > Phone: +420777974800
> > IRC: mhroncok
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
> I'm not aware of a RHEL clone that offers all the architectures that
> EPEL does.  As far as I can tell, the three most popular (Alma, Rocky,
> Oracle) only offer x86_64 and aarch64 but are missing ppc64le and
> s390x.  That said CentOS Linux 8 doesn't offer s390x either, so we
> already have this problem, but switch the EPEL mock chroot to one of
> those clones would make the situation worse by also dropping ppc64le.
>

I've been informed that AlmaLinux is working on ppc64le support, and
it's supposed to be released "soon". Perhaps Jack can provide an
update here?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux