On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-11-22.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
A lot of virt and filesystem packages are shown in the report, but I
think it seems to be a mistake.
For example qemu:
qemu (maintained by: berrange, bonzini, crobinso, dwmw2, ehabkost, jforbes, lkundrak, quintela, rjones, virtmaint-sig)
qemu-2:6.1.0-10.fc36.src requires glusterfs-api-devel = 10.0-1.fc36
This is provided by libgfapi-devel which appears to exist still.
It exists, but it is from the glusterfs package, which is also included in the
report. The dependency is transitive (and in this case, indirect, because only
glusterfs-ganesha is impacted).
So I think this line is wrong.
That is a matter of perspective. If nobody does anything, qemu will be removed
from the distribution in ~1 year:
1. ipmitool will be retired in 6 weeks
2. fence-agents-ipmilan will fail to install
3. fence-agents will be orphaned in 8 weeks
4. fence-agents will be retired in 6 weeks
5. pcs will fail to build
6. pcs will be orphaned in 8 weeks
7. pcs will be retired in 6 weeks
8. glusterfs-ganesha will fail to install
9. glusterfs will orphaned in 8 weeks
10. glusterfscs will be retired in 6 weeks
11. qemu will fail to build and qemu-block-gluster will fail to install
13. qemu will be orphaned in 8 weeks
14. qemu will be retired in 6 weeks
This line of events is very long and can be stopped at any point by fixing at
least one package or dropping a dependency somewhere or removing a no longer
wanted subpackage.
Hence, technically, the danger to qemu is minimal. But the chain is there.
Especially the build time only transitive dependencies behave like this.
Does the tool which generates the report
follow provides in other packages?
Yes.
qemu-block-gluster-2:6.1.0-10.fc36.x86_64 requires libgfapi.so.0()(64bit), libgfapi.so.0(GFAPI_3.4.0)(64bit), libgfapi.so.0(GFAPI_3.5.0)(64bit), libgfapi.so.0(GFAPI_6.0)(64bit)
These are provided by libgfapi0, see below. This seems like a
different kind of mistake from above.
Same thing.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
