Re: libnsl.so.2.0.1 updated to libnsl.so.3.0.0 without coordination, broke rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:49:40PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:55 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since this update:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libnsl2/c/d2e2fab5e3ab07228a34f35ab8ec1954581153d0?branch=rawhide
> >
> > Nothing in rawhide builds, because Python and hence dnf is not installable:
> >
> 
> 
> 

> Is it possible to automate a scan across (at least) the "core"(*)
> packages and identify those spec files that use one of the (from the
> packaging guidelines) SHOULD NOT unversioned soname globs and then
> have explicit major sonames added(**)?  Of course such a change will
> not prevent explicit bumps, but should, at a minimum, raise the bar
> just a bit for accidental bumps (which is what I presume this was
> when the new upstream source was submitted as an update).

This has been discussed many many times. The packaging guidelines have
been updated to say globs "SHOULD NOT" be used [1], and I think there is a
broad agreement that this is a good thing. Unfortunately many packages
still use this pattern.

I think we need a hero (or a small team of heroes) to
1. download the all-specs.tar.xz file and grep for the any spec files that have globs
2. figure out a list and propose a mass change [2]
3. apply all the changes everywhere

That last step will require provenpackager privs.
I could help a bit, esp. with the last step, if somebody wants to
do this.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_shared_library_files
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/

Zbyszek

> (*) Is there such a list of "core" libraries?
> If not, that might need to be another
> item on the work queue.
> 
> (**) I am presuming that most of the
> unversioned soname globs in most
> spec files predate the SHOULD NOT
> recommendations, and cleaning that
> up would be a good thing moving
> forward.
Ah, right, I didn't read the footnote before writing the text above ;)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux