On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 7:33 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 11. 11. 21 v 15:24 Ben Cotton napsal(a): > > ELN-extras will be a new build target and compose similar in behavior > > to ELN, but closer to EPEL in function. It will be a place to prepare > > and maintain packages that may be desired for EPEL N+1 while RHEL N+1 > > is still being incubated in ELN. > > For these not aware what ELN is: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/eln/ > > Too many abbreviations. :( So the situation is: > > EPEL are extra packages for RHEL. > > EPEL-next are extra packages for CentOS Stream. [I still think this should be CentOS Stream {extra,epel,next}] > > ELN-extras are extra packages for ELN (which is rebuild of rawhide in RHEL like compose). > > Right? > > > Can this change proposal document the name of dist-git branches? I do not see it anywhere. That's because, like ELN, it will use the Rawhide branch. Separate branches for ELN/ELN-extras are discouraged (but we are working on ways to allow them for specific cases). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
