seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 16:57 -0400, kas wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 16:17 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
As was pointed out to me - I need to mark down today on my calendar:
June 14th - someone on fedora-devel-list said something positive about
yum.
:)
thanks,
-sv
I must say that yum has been working magnificently around here lately and
on the odd occasion where there was a hickup/operator error, a solution
was posted almost immediately. There is no question in my mind that if
Fedora is to be the success we all hope it will be, it will be in large
part due to the blood, sweat and tears Seth has poured into Yum.
There lots of folks beyond me working on this now.
Take a look at the AUTHORS file in the docs of yum.
All of those folks deserve credit.
-sv
I'm using yum in a bi-arch environment and I have no complaints. Well
indeed it works like a charm.
--
Manuel Moreno
manolo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
