> > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the > > world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta > > rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with > > high data expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a > > setting to turn it off is still a sane choice. Just my 2 cents. > > Did you read the other replies? It doesn't save much and some have said > it causes even more downloading. And it's even worse if there's a long > time between updates, which is more likely for someone in that situation. The problem is with ‘discarding generated deltarpm data’ every day; please see earlier discussions where Kevin Fenzi et al. explains the **implementation/policy** issues, for instance at [1]. Deltarpm, if implemented to meet its original purpose, will be very useful to a lot of people. It might even be useful to all Fedora users in general as it should reduce network transfer overall. Deltarpm did reduce a lot of update download size for many years since 2007; it would be fantastic to fix the implementation shortcomings and maybe make it useful in other use cases (Edge/IoT) and prepare it for a better future? [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/TCDRL4A57BXPBFA3YZ4S5BHJEMTVGNAD/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
