On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09:47:12AM +0100, Jiri Vanek wrote: > On 11/1/21 18:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:37:42AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > >>== Dependencies == > >>Around 2000 packages will need attendance (that is aprox 1/3 of time > >>of jdk11 bump, but It seems, that 1100 packages remained on jdk8) > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-headless |wc -l > >> 1007 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java | wc -l > >> 53 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-devel | wc -l > >> 28 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless |wc -l > >> 1003 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-1.8.0-openjdk | wc -l > >> 80 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel | wc -l > >> 42 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-11-openjdk-headless |wc -l > >> 1030 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-11-openjdk | wc -l > >> 78 > >> $ repoquery -q --whatrequires java-11-openjdk-devel | wc -l > >> 36 > >Shouldn't those queries be done with 'repoquery --arch src' ? > > They should be run together with it. Quick scan made them all return 0... > Will add this . > > > >>== Contingency Plan == > >>* If the mass rebuild, after the change application, breaks to much > >>packages, or some important will be unfixable, jdk11 must be restored > >>back to the position of system jdk. > >>* Contingency mechanism: Return jdk8 as system jdk and mass rebuild > >>again. Note, that this may be very hard, because during build of > >>packages by jdk8, by jdk11 built dependencies will be picekd up, so > >>build will fail. Maybe several iterations of mass rebuild will be > >>needed. > >>* Contingency deadline: beta freeze > > > >Hmm, so if the contingency plan may require a few rounds of rebuilds, > >should we activate it earlier than beta freeze? At the beta freeze > >we expect things to be "testable", and if at that point we are with > >a bunch of java applications that will not run, it'll be hard to test > >things. So I think we should move this a bit earlier. > > You are most likely right. > Considering it should really be finished before branching, taht moves it somewhere to : > 73 Announce release blocking deliverables Tue 2022-02-01 Tue 2022-02-01 0 (8days before branching, 22 before beta freeze) > > wdyt? +1 Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure