On 2021-10-31 10:14, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 5:37 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
<luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2021-10-21 02:01, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Have you managed to get this to work, or what is the particular issue?
Fonts SIG helped resolve the issue. You can view the updated spec files
below:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/julietaula-montserrat-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/julietaula-montserrat-fonts.spec
I'm not sure if this is a problem (or will be a problem at some point) ...
After this update, two subpackages that are no longer part of this
package are remaining on the system, and only removed when running
"dnf autoremove" manually:
- julietaula-montserrat-base-web-fonts
- julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common
Are they really no longer required by anything, and those files no
longer provided by any subpackage?
Then these two should be obsoleted by one of the remaining font subpackages.
Only fedora-logos-https required these subpackages which is no longer
the case.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-logos/c/2fef53b9705afc7539a0556fa9b2577adca1e29c?branch=rawhide
julietaula-montserrat-fonts-common should be automatically removed on
updated, but it seems not the case suggesting a bug.
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
