Re: Package owner required for ImageMagick

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:47:14AM -0000, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Sounds as if we need to keep ImageMagick 6.x for legacy reasons as long as
> it's safe to do so, but instead of switching to 7.x at some point,
> switching to GraphicsMagick is at most as much work if not less, but more
> future-proof?

As someone who endorsed this suggestion before, I should probably make sure
this contrary view is seen: 

   https://stackoverflow.com/a/56220630/479426 

In short, in the 20 years since the fork, ImageMagick has grown a lot of
fancy new features, and may in fact be better behaved in some
security-related cases.

However, I am still in favor of replacing ImageMagick with GraphicsMagick,
because:

1. If your use case is advanced image processing for, for example, computer
   vision, there are _so many other better library-based approaches_, and

2. If security is your concern, _oh god please don't do that it's too late
   already_.


	
-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux