V Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 12:29:01PM -0600, Orion Poplawski napsal(a): > On 9/10/21 6:26 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > Good news, module maintainers. > > > > I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format, > > modulemd-packager, version 3. > > > > Question: is this necessary for all modules to migrate to this format, or is > it primarily useful for modules that depend on other modules? > I cannot provide you with any better answer than I've already stated in my original message: It is primarily useful for modules which depends on other modules. It is not necessary for all modules right now, because both MBS and DNF support both of the formats. However, I won't speculate how long they will support them. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
