On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 25. 09. 21 11:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > So, if I understand correctly, the problem is that right now there's > > no *existing* tool that reliably detects if a given "executable" (has > > mode +x) is an actual executable "script" with a valid shebang? > > - We need to detect "scripts" that are executable but have no shebnag. > - We need to detect "scripts" that are executable and have a shebnag to mangle. > - We might want to detect binary files that are executable but shouldn't be > (such as images), but this was not the original purpose of the BRP script. If I gave you a program /usr/bin/isexec that determines if a file is a valid executable, i.e. - ELF binary with ELF header / magic number, - PE binary with MZ magic number, - script with shebang line (whether in need of mangling or not), would that help? (I.e. something like this POC: https://github.com/ironthree/isexec ?) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
