Re: Introducing ABI changes in libolm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is upstream wrong?  Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care
of?

I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump.

Upstream developers decided to hide internal symbols from ELF/DLL export tables. I agree that these symbols are part of the private API and shouldn't be used by dependent projects.

As per Fedora packaging guidelines, I've to announce the API/ABI changes.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux