g-i-s is still broken in the Workstation iso for Rawhide today btw just fyi, crashing after install in a Virtualbox VM for me
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:20 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_______________________________________________On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
<rawhide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ===== ADDED PACKAGES =====
> Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library
> RPMs: atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc
> Size: 1.35 MiB
(...)
> Package: glibmm2.68-2.68.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the GLib library
> RPMs: glibmm2.68 glibmm2.68-devel glibmm2.68-doc
> Size: 12.65 MiB
>
> Package: gtkmm4.0-4.4.0-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for the GTK+ library
> RPMs: gtkmm4.0 gtkmm4.0-devel gtkmm4.0-doc
> Size: 17.64 MiB
>
> Package: pangomm2.48-2.48.1-1.fc36
> Summary: C++ interface for Pango
> RPMs: pangomm2.48 pangomm2.48-devel pangomm2.48-doc
> Size: 1.26 MiB
Is there a reason why these compat packages are done "the wrong way round"?
They were requested with exceptions to the review process, but that
exception only applies to requesting versioned compat packages for the
*old* version, not the other way round ...Sure, there's a good reason! I wanted to keep the same pattern as gtk has, so that there's gtk3 and matching gtkmm3.0, and gtk4 and matching gtkmm4.0.They are all long-lived parallel installable packages and most stuff is going to be using the "old" gtkmm3.0 still for a number of years to come.Doing it this way also makes it much easier to add the new packages to F34 where I don't want to be undertaking large package renaming.--Kalev
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
