On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:20:06AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Sahana, > > > > > > > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to > > > > watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a > > > > new release, I am preparing update for it, but I am not sure where should I > > > > watch for a progress. Even build of openssl itself does not reference any > > > > bug. Is there any better tracker than bug #1825937, which I can monitor for > > > > progress? Is the koji build the best way to check readiness? Does exist any > > > > variant of RHEL9 bug #1958021 > > > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958021> for Fedora Rawhide? > > > > > > > > Is there any expected timeline, how long it might take to merge the > > > > side-tag? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Petr, > > > > > > I have merged the side-tag [1]. > > > I would however need karma for it to get to stable. > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ee8c904f46 > > > > > > I will send a list of the failed packages shortly. > > > > systemd was built into the side-tag yesterday [1], > > but doesn't appear in the update… > > > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1832196 > > Oh, I see it finished building after you merged the tag. Dunno, > maybe the update should be updated? > > -- > > Another issue: the update has 1006 "automated tests", out of which > 1001 fail! I think is very wrong with "automated tests" is the > out-of-the-box success rate is below 0.005%. > > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides libcrypto.so.3()(64bit) needed by zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64 > - nothing provides libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit) needed by zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64 > - nothing provides libssl.so.3()(64bit) needed by zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64 > - nothing provides libssl.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)(64bit) needed by zola-0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64 > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > Installation of zola-0:0.12.2-8.fc36.x86_64 failed. > > So... is the test ignoring the fact that the package is part of > an update and trying to install rpms individually? Another one (https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/fedora-ci/job/rpminspect-pipeline/job/master/42395/testReport/(root)/tests/_annocheck/) """ Error Message Test "/annocheck" failed. Find out more about this test in the documentation: https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect#rpminspect Found a bug? Please open an issue in the issue tracker: https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issues """ How on earth are we supposed to figure out what annocheck doesn't like? There's 185328 bytes of "Standard Output" that follows… Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
