tor, 09.06.2005 kl. 14.42 skrev Rui Miguel Seabra: > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 05:34 -0700, Colin Charles wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 09:53 +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > > > > I hate to admit it but I remove all the redhat update stuff as well and > > > > > use yum or apt-get (if i'm feeling impatient). I used ubuntu for awhile > > > > > (but ultimately found fedora to be superior) and found their update > > > > > functionality much more usable. > > > > > > > > Since one of the goals of FC5 is to have pup in place to handle updates > > > > from a graphical point of view, I'd be interested in hearing what sorts > > > > of things made the Ubuntu stuff more usable. Or the same for other > > > > distros as well. > > > > Just to make it clear, Ubuntu just has: dpkg/apt, Synaptic, and > > update-notifier, right? > > > > We (will) have: rpm/yum, s-c-packages(okay, pup), and pup's > > update-notifier > > They have a graphical update manager that's very fancy. Probably the > update-notifier icon is part of that update manager. > > Another very interesting thing is that every single one of those apps > around packaging use the same repo settings (besides other settings), so > they feel integrated. > > Rui They all use apt, so apt sources is always used. I think Fedora is also heading that way (yum). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
