Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts".

Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora?

On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58:
You're right, i underestimated the issue.
Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be.

I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+

Thank you.

There is useful information on debian:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263


--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagitter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux