Re: mtune=nocona

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:28 +0100, P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:15:48AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > 
> >>The question, distilled:
> >>
> >>Would you like: (a) Small speed hit for Opteron users, OR (b) much
> >>larger speed hit for EM64T users?
> > 
> > note the hit is REALLY REALLY small. Hard to measure kind of small.
> 
> Have you compared -march=k8 with -mtune=nocona ?

I didn't personally, but our gcc guys did and they said it was hardly
measureable if at all.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux