Re: f35-backgrounds ready for review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> > zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +0000, Zbigniew
> > > > Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one source
> > > > >package:
> > > > >
> > > > >fedora-backgrounds/f34 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..34
> > > > >fedora-backgrounds/f35 => builds all subpackages in the range 21..35
> > > >
> > > > Assuming this range notation is a half-open interval
> > >
> > > Closed on both sides, I think. But we actually have backgrounds for
> > > earlier releases too, see below.
> > >
> > > > , yes, I like
> > > > this idea. Then each subsequent release could take the wallpapers
> > > > from its predecessor and create a new subpackage named with the
> > > > previous version.
> > >
> > > I think it'd look like this (e.g. f35 branch):
> > >
> > > ...
> > > %package -n beefy-miracle-backgrounds
> > > Summary: Backgrounds for f17
> > > ...
> > > %package -n f21-backgrounds
> > > Summary: Backgrounds for f21
> > > ...
> > > %package -n f35-backgrounds
> > > Summary: Backgrounds for f35
> > > Provides: fedora-backgrounds    # only when f35 is the latest
> > >
> > > and then for f36 this would be extended with:
> > >
> > > %package -n f36-backgrounds
> > > Summary: Backgrounds for f36
> > > Provides: fedora-backgrounds    # moved here when f36 becomes the latest
> > >
> > >
> > Currently, the spec file has subpackages for each desktop environment
> > though (e.g. f35-backgrounds-gnome, f35-backgrounds-kde, etc.) since they
> > have to be installed in different places for each background. How would we
> > handle that in this type of spec file organization?
>
> The same, just have a bunch more of subpackages. A bit messy, but
> still better than a review and a new package every 6 months.

One big downside of this approach would be *absolutely huge* sources
(all wallpapers since ancient Fedora), even if split into multiple
tarballs.
The way it's done today, only wallpapers for *one* fedora release have
to be uploaded / downloaded at a time.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux