Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 07:38 -0600 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> On 8/18/21 2:23 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> > On 8/17/21 10:21 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > On 8/14/21 10:19 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 09:34:11PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > > > Have there been any recent changes to the arm (32bit)
> > > > > builders?  It 
> > > > > seems
> > > > > like I'm having much more issues there with builds likely
> > > > > running 
> > > > > out of
> > > > > memory or similar.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had
> > > > ~3GB
> > > > memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they
> > > > see
> > > > 40GB memory), but this causes
> > > > 
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183
> > > > 
> > > > basically OOM kills kojid, which restarts kojid, which restarts
> > > > the
> > > > build, which kills kojid, etc...
> > > > 
> > > > I've tried all kinds of things here, but haven't been able to
> > > > find any
> > > > way to make it work. Arm folks can't duplicate it on non koji
> > > > builders.
> > > > I suspect the number of people using lpae on 32bit arm is...
> > > > low.
> > > > We could just go back to non lpae, but that breaks building some
> > > > other
> > > > packages (llvm fails to build for example).
> > > > 
> > > > It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go...
> > > > (insert pitchforks and torches).
> > > > 
> > > > Anyhow, if anyone has any ideas, let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > kevin
> > > 
> > > hours - had completed extracting debuginfo and was on to checking
> > > the 
> > > build root last I saw) restarted. This is pretty unworkable.
> > > 
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=73984672
> > > 
> > 
> > I kicked this off again to see if the ARM builder kernel changes
> > help. 
> > I'm waiting on VTK to complete to do a rebuild of PCL.
> > 
> > Rich
> 
> Well, that build unfortunately failed due to gcc getting killed (the 
> usual arm OOM symptom).  Looks like another try has been started.  If 
> that fails I think I'll need to bump down ncpus yet more (already 
> dropped from 5 to 3).


Looks like this time the build is likely going to pass, as it already
reached the "extracting debuginfo" step.  =)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux