Re: Updating quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide - rebuild of several packages in side-tag needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser
<besser82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future
> > F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so
> > -> libquazip1-qt4.so and libquazip5.so -> libquazip1-qt5.so), I will
> > need the dependent packages' maintainers (in Bcc) to rebuild them in a
> > side tag (I'm not a provenpackager, so I can't do that myself,
> > although Nicolas (@kwizart) offered to help if needed).
> >
> > Affected packages:
> > bletchmame
> > ckb-next
> > fritzing
> > gimagereader
> > GLC_lib
> > keepassxc
> > krita
> > nomacs
> > qcad
> > qmapshack
> > texstudio
> >
> > Even though the library/include/CMake paths changed, there seem to be
> > no breaking API changes and I added compat symlinks/files to the
> > -devel packages so that all packages using the old paths will still
> > build (and link against the new soname) without modification (I tested
> > this in COPR, see [3]). So a simple release bump + rebuild into the
> > side tag should be enough.
> >
> > After the side tag is merged, I will try to gradually submit PRs to
> > migrate the dependent packages to use the new paths (either via
> > pkgconfig or the CMake modules). Once all dependent packages are
> > migrated, it will be possible to remove the compat hacks from -devel
> > packages (though we might want to keep them longer for user
> > convenience).
> >
> > Current plan:
> > 1. I request a side tag, merge [2], and build the new quazip in the
> > side tag.
> > 2. I announce the side-tag in this thread and ask for dependent
> > packages to be rebuilt in it.
> > 3. Once all the packages are successfully built in the side tag, I get
> > the side tag merged.
> >
> > If there are no objections, I will execute steps 1 and 2 sometime next
> > week (or sooner if I get a positive acknowledgement for all packages).
> > Maintainers, please let me know if you are ready to do the side-tag
> > rebuild, or if you'd prefer to defer this a bit (for example due to a
> > conflict with other group rebuild).
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895170
> > [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/quazip/pull-request/2
> > [3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/omos/quazip/monitor/
>
>
> As everything seems prepared readily, and there a currently no
> conflicting rebuilds going on, I'm going to do a rebuild of all packages
> in sidetag: f36-build-side-44792
>
> I'll give short notice, as soon as the sidetag is merged with rawhide.

OK, I was going to kick it off in the evening [CEST], but I'm
perfectly fine with you doing it all in one go, since you made sure
there are no apparent conflicts. Thank you!

-- 
Ondrej Mosnacek
Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux