Re: Seemingly wrong FailsToInstall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Jan Drögehoff napsal(a):
> I've received 2 automated bugzilla reports for F35[1] and F36[2] that my
> package FailsToInstall.
> 
> I tried to replicate this with a Fedora 35 and Rawhide VM created from the
> last known good ISOs provided by the nightly compose finder and found
> everything to be working as expected.
> 
> Is there something I am overlooking or did the automatic process fall flat?
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994972
> 
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994961
> 
The bugs are about missing liblldCOFF.so.12()(64bit). Those are provided by
lld-libs from lld-12.0.1-1.fc35. I recall there were issues with merging llvm
from a side tag (some packages were missing in the target tag) recently. Maybe
that caused it.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux