Add Kazu in cc list
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 10:45, lijiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In Fedora crash.spec, currently the LTO is disabled as below:
>
> +# This package has an internal copy of GDB which has broken configure code for
> +# INTDIV0_RAISES_SIGFPE and MUST_REINSTALL_SIGHANDLERS
> +# Updating that code properly seems nontrivial and best left to the package
> +# maintainer.
> +# Disable LTO
Hi Lianbo, the above words seem to suggest disable LTO intentionally,
I know the upstream crash tool is working on gdb 10.x integration,
maybe the above is eased already with the latest gdb update?
> +%define _lto_cflags %{nil}
>
> commit: c6fc69dae3a2 ("Disable LTO")
>
> In RHEL9, that(disable LTO) was inherited from Fedora. But, currently a bug is reported to enable the LTO build for RHEL9:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990071.
>
> I tried to remove the macro "%define _lto_cflags %{nil}" from the crash.spec, and then build the rpm packages, But I didn't see the lto flag such as "-flto" or "-ffat-lto-objects" during the whole build stage, and the build process passed without any error reports.
>
> I'm wondering if it could rely on the redhat-rpm-config macro or it(LTO flag) can take effect when the toolchain is clang(not gcc)? Any thoughts?
The question seems about how to enable LTO instead of if it is ok to
enable LTO. Maybe Jeff and others can provide some inputs
>
> Thanks.
> Lianbo
>
>
>
> But
Thanks
Dave
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
