Le mar. 17 août 2021 à 17:21, Евгений Пивнев <ti.eugene@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > As I found my package qpdfview cannot be build in F35. > Package marked as FTBFS: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987904 > > Koji build says: > > DEBUG util.py:444: Error: > DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package qt5-qttools-devel-5.15.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires qt5-doctools = 5.15.2-6.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed > DEBUG util.py:444: - conflicting requests > DEBUG util.py:444: - nothing provides libclang.so.12()(64bit) needed by qt5-doctools-5.15.2-6.fc35.x86_64 > DEBUG util.py:444: - nothing provides libclang.so.12(LLVM_12)(64bit) needed by qt5-doctools-5.15.2-6.fc35.x86_64 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74013269 > > What to do? I've experienced the same issue with my build (onednn) on f35 (only, not rawhide). It was related to an indirect dependency on clang (needed by doxygen). Seems like the clang12 compatibility package isn't in the buildroot yet. I've used fedpkg build --target f35-build-side-43964 Now I wonder if doxygen (and many other packages) shouldn't be rebuilt for clang-13 instead. I'm especially worried that some packages will be rebuilt with clang/llvm 13 and others kept as 12. There might be symbol versioning with clang/llvm ?... but still it's annoying as a dependency mix... So what's the plan ? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
