On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:44 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14. 08. 21 18:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go... > > (insert pitchforks and torches). > > Let's propose it and see what people say? As a package maintainer, I would > certainly appreciate this. > > I can draft a change proposal next week. I think there's some variables we need to consider here, for example: - Which 32-bit ARM hardware does Fedora currently support, and how old are those boards? Can we drop support for those with, let's say, Fedora 36? - What's the impact on different editions, like on the IoT Edition? My guess is that it's the one that's most impacted by dropping 32-bit ARM support (though I may be wrong here). If those two are no problem, then I'd probably support dropping armv7hl from Fedora as well. It's probably easier to do than dropping 32-bit x86, because there's no multilib support on aarch64 in Fedora. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
