Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It looks like none of the packages I maintain or co-maintain that depend on boost-devel were rebuilt before the side tag was merged.

Some (luminance-hdr, cpp-hocon) had automated FTI bugs filed; these were fixed by a manual rebuild on my part. Another (usd) should be in the same boat once some unrelated problems causing FTBFS are resolved.

Others (cairomm/cairomm1.16) presumably used only header-only parts of Boost, and were silently continuing to use the old Boost. I rebuilt these as well.

It’s probably worth looking into the process for finding and rebuilding dependent packages to see why these were not rebuilt, as there must be many other packages that also should have been rebuilt but were not.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux