* Kaleb Keithley: > ah, I missed that. I looked, but not hard enough apparently, and I presumed it was related > to changes in the code. > > <https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/927> > > but I expect upstream does not care about ABI. > > Maybe the other way would be to patch that change back out in Fedora. > Since f34 has been updated to leveldb-1.23 too (in testing) maybe > that's a better solution to preserve the ABI and also not bump the > soname? Yeah, reverting -fno-rtti downstream probably is the right approach, at least in the short term. Maybe in the long term as well: it's not reasonable to expect everyone that uses leveldb to build with -fno-rtti. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
