On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 11:11 AM Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think at this stage it may be safer to defer to F36, and land OpenSSL > > 3.0 in rawhide right after F35 forks out. > > > > I'm generally in agreement here; I think it's too much risk too late > in the cycle. Could you re-propose the Change for F36? I'm not sure I agree, but the Change owners can request the proposal to be deferred to F36, which I *personally* would accept if they intended to import OpenSSL 3.0 into Rawhide *right* after branching. No more delaying it since it's clearly being done in RHEL (which is already super-backwards to begin with). This Change has already been deferred once (it was originally planned for F34). I don't want it deferred again without a plan to work on it *in Fedora*. Otherwise, just abandon the Change entirely. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
