On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 6:49 PM Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/30/21 5:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > It would need a maintainer. Any takers? ... > > If we want it to work with UEFI Secure Boot > > enabled, it'd need to be signed with Fedora's key > > > Does the signing requirement imply that the maintainer would need to be > a Red Hat employee (or another trusted party)? > > I'm interested in contributing more than I do currently, but I'm not > sure what the process of signing a bootable image looks like. If I'm in > a position to do so, I'd be interested in acting as a maintainer or > co-maintainer for the package. > Unfortunately, yes. As far as I know, non-RH folks are not allowed to do builds that are signed with the production Fedora secure boot key. But that doesn't stop anyone from maintaining an unsigned version. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
