Re: Fedora 35 Mass Rebuild update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:30 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21/07/2021 17:15, Jerry James wrote:
> > In fact, the ones I've looked at are empty commits.  There is a commit
> > message, but no changes of any kind to the spec file: no release bump,
> > no changelog entry.
>
> Yes, I can confirm[1]:
>
> Authored and Committed by releng 3 hours ago
> 0 file changed. 0 lines added. 0 lines removed.
>
> [1]:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aircrack-ng/c/b9c84c950c4a300709ac6dfee5d0a3b83c42447e?branch=rawhide

That would be the right thing to do for packages using rpmautospec.
My suspicion is that rpmautospec support was added to the rebuild
script, but it is somehow detecting packages that do not actually use
rpmautospec.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux