On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:49 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 20/07/2021 05:03, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > Source code for > > pycharm is apparently available: if you'd like to get that into EPEL > > or Fedora, I'd suggest you start from source. > > I know, but Java stack on Fedora is completely broken. PyCharm CE cannot > be completely built from sources, that's why we uses COPR instead of the > main Fedora repository. > > > If you're going to to that, please reflect it in the > > name of your packages, say as pycharm-community_bin. > > We're not on Arch Linux. You're violating the bundling and naming practices that EPEL and Fedora have used for years, especially their insistence that they build from source, not repackaging bundled binaries from someone else into an RPM. There are a whole stack of security reasons to discourage that, and assuring the original source code and build tools are available for others to modify is vital to "free software" in the GPL sense. To quote you: "PyCharm CE cannot be completely built from sources". If that were completely true, it could not be built on COPR. If it's broken on Fedora, please, work with *that*, and I suspect that resolving that will resolve the missing dependency issue. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
