Once upon a time, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> <thebs413@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > OpenSSL _is_ a BSD-style license and GPL compatible. The OpenSSL license is an old-style BSD type license with the advertising clause, which I understand to be incompatible with the GPL. That's part of why some programs are moving to the (LGPLed) GNU TLS library instead. > If something it going to go into init, IMHO, it had better be GPL or at > least GPL compatible. If it requires random services to link or include the code, it should probably be BSD (non-advertising clause). Otherwise, things like Oracle won't be able to start at boot. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
