On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 12:13:20AM +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Am 09.07.21 um 17:45 schrieb Ben Cotton: > >== Detailed Description == > >The use of SHA-1 is no longer permitted for Digital Signatures or > >authentication in RHEL-9. Due to this reason, there is a need to > >remove SHA-1 extension from sqlite in RHEL-9 and therefore also > >Fedora. > > I don't think that this is a valid logical conclusion. Fedora is > (should be?) upstream to RHEL 9 so you can disable SHA1 in RHEL 9 > but keep it enabled in Fedora. There is certainly no "need" for this > change as demonstrated by the various packaging changes done in > RHEL. > > (FWIW I don't particularly care about SHA1 functionality in sqlite.) Also: if it is not the recommended choice, why not just select something else as the default (which is already the case, iiuc), and let users use sha-1 to access existing databases? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
