Chris Ricker wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Bill Nottingham wrote:Bryan J. Smith (b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx) said:On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:Well, there are some plans here. They don't usually involve bash,Well, I'm half-way decent at system-level C (even some real-time experience), as well as Perl, but no Python though (one of these days).though, and generally consist of migrating to a completely different framework, with support for legacy installation concerns such as LSB compatibility and the current init-style scripts.So the base won't be traditional System-V init?Correct. (Well, the core *init* under everything may or may not change; but it certainly won't be the same interface from userland.)Is this going to be based on / similar to anything existing, or something new entirely? So far, everything you've said is sounding a *lot* like the redone services stuff in Solaris 10. The main difference would just be the use of D-BUS for communication rather than the Solaris-specific stuff SMF uses (svc.startd, mainly).... See <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1985/6mhm8o5n0?a=view> for an overview of svcs, svcadm, svccfg, etc As an added benefit, the architecture Sun has for all this really has drastically reduced boot times (which I know is always a complaint people seem to have on Linux for some reason). Solaris 9 -> Solaris 10 went from ~3 minutes to ~25 seconds to boot (from the OBP to login prompt) on one of my workstations, for example later, chris
It will probably be a new implementation, but might contain code or ideas from existing projects. See the (new) wiki page at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FCNewInit for an outline of what's on the table. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx www.n-man.com --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
