On 07. 07. 21 15:26, Peter Robinson wrote:
sugar-view-slides callkalpa, chimosky, pbrobinson, tuxbrewr Fedora 31
I believe the sugar people are working on that now.
As said last week:
"""
Fails to install, fails to build since Fedora 32, was exempted from this policy
last time with a promise of a fix.
Has many bugzillas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=sugar-view-slides&product=Fedora
"""
I don't understand what is the benefit of keeping this broken package in the
repos. Why don't we retire it and unretire it once actually fixed?
zram pbrobinson Fedora 32
That's fixed.
I am confused. Fixed how exactly? As said last week:
"""
This might not actually be a FTBFS, but simply a package that has not been
built in 1.5 years.
It has a noautobuild file with:
> it's a couple of bash scripts, no need for rebuilds
I tend to disagree with that statement. The rebuilds are useful for:
- new possible dependency generators
- new possible buildroot policy scripts
- new RPM/buildsystem features (compression, content signatures, etc.)
I think it's worth rebuilding it at least once in a year.
"""
See the thread for reaction(s):
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/3RJHPPF66KQ4RPDHTADLKBJJLDW3CKE2/
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
