Re: building against epel8 modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:20 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 4:58 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:25 PM Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> > > Welcome to RHEL-8 modularity and the joy it brings anyone trying to
>> > > port software to 8. The problem is not with EPEL but with the way
>> >
>> > hmm.  Thanx a lot of for a bt of light in darknes.. or mayb emore darkness in twilight :-)
>>
>> I can't find *anyone* who likes modularity. I'm devoutly hoping that
>> it is discarded for RHEL 9.
>
>
> For the record, it is not being discarded in RHEL 9.
>
> josh

Any chance of ignoring it almost entirely, or only using it for
modular packages? It caused real dependency for some perl modules, and
even the name is confusing when we start talking about perl and python
modules.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux