Hm, the package should probably also be renamed to coffeescript, because
upstream renamed AFAIK
Vít
Dne 23. 06. 21 v 15:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Thank you for looking into it. So far, I have pushed just the fixed
version:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f7598c56fc
because there is more things which depends on coffee-script:
$ sudo dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--whatrequires coffee-script
vim-syntastic-coffee-0:3.10.0-9.fc34.noarch
$ sudo dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--whatrequires js-coffee-script
rubygem-coffee-script-source-0:1.10.0-11.fc34.noarch
$ sudo dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source
--arch src --whatrequires js-coffee-script
rubygem-coffee-script-source-0:1.10.0-11.fc34.src
$ sudo dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source
--arch src --whatrequires coffee-script
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-AssetPack-0:2.13-2.fc35.src
$ sudo dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source
--arch src --whatrequires 'rubygem(coffee-script)'
rubygem-actioncable-0:6.1.3.2-1.fc35.src
rubygem-coffee-rails-0:5.0.0-1.fc34.src
rubygem-sprockets-0:4.0.2-2.fc34.src
rubygem-tilt-0:2.0.10-5.fc35.src
So these would need some testing.
Dne 21. 06. 21 v 1:28 Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 16:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 17:05 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
coffee-script package was recently retired due to being orphaned and
FTBFS for some while. Since there are some other packages depending
on
it, I have decided to unretire it [1]. I have working package ready
(at
since F29):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70366160
Is here anybody, who would will to help with maintenance of this
package?
In the last few days I tried to keep the package.
Updating from 1.10.0 to 2.5.1 build fails with "Error: Cannot find
module 'jison'" but jison is retired since 2019-05 (1) so I guest it
will be hard .
(1)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-jison
this weekend I played with nodejs-packaging-bundler and I could build
nodejs-jison
Are you interested in resurrecting nodejs-jison? Why not to use the
bundled version should this path to be chosen? And you have not used
the Fedora version of uglify-js ...
Vít
and coffeescript 2.5.1 on copr (2) , the specs are here
(3) and (4)
Best regards,
(2)
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/nodejs/builds/
(3)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/nodejs-jison/commits/f30
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/nodejs-jison/tree/f30
(4)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/sergiomb/rpms/coffee-script/commits/rawhide
Thx
Vít
[1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10172
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
