Re: F35 Change: Python Packaging Guidelines overhaul (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'll address the larger "mandatory tests" issue later; thanks for all your concerns!
This point deserves a reply on its own:

On 14. 06. 21 19:35, Benjamin Beasley wrote:
[...]
It’s also not clear to me why the Python guidelines should be so much stricter than the overall Fedora guidelines (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_test_suites) in this area.

Two reasons:
- Python is a dynamic language; most errors only happen at runtime. In C, just compiling and linking might work as a reasonable smoke test. - I'd like the Python guidelines to be a bit "ahead" of the Fedora-wide ones. The proposal contains a few ideas that might be better Fedora-wide, but I'd rather introduce and test them in the ecosystem I know.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux