On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 16:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2021-06-05 at 12:19 +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote: > > > On 6/4/21 12:30 AM, Jerry James wrote: > > > > I have packages that depend directly on the following, so I am > > > > willing > > > > to adopt them if nobody more competent shows up (although there > > > > is no > > > > point in taking ant-contrib if ant is going to be broken anyway): > > > > - ant-contrib > > > > - jakarta-common-httpclient > > > > - jakarta-ws-rs > > > > - maven-invoker-plugin > > > > - spec-version-maven-plugin > > > > > > > > I introduced the jansi1 and jline2 packages so that jansi could > > > > be > > > > moved to 2.x and jline to 3.x, but I don't actually maintain any > > > > packages that need the old versions. I would like to give them > > > > away > > > > to someone who needs them, but note that you will need to grab > > > > jansi-native as well, before Monday! > > > > > > > > Has anybody already done something about any of these packages > > > > (and > > > > my > > > > packager-dashboard page just hasn't caught up yet)? Is anybody > > > > planning to do something about any of these packages before they > > > > are > > > > retired on Monday? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I looked at the orphaned packages looking for new maintainers, > > > which affects Clojure-packages and decided to take these: > > > > > > korkeala: spice-parent, maven-invoker, maven-invoker-plugin, > > > plexus-velocity, maven-script-interpreter, maven-mapping, weld- > > > parent, > > > aopalliance, jakarta-server-pages, javaparser, jakarta-interceptors > > > > > > these were already taken by someone else: > > > apache-ivy, jansi-native > > > > > > Not really sure in what state these packages are, if I dont > > > have time to maintain them I'll reorphan them and orphan > > > the Clojure packages as well. > > > > I also have the same plan (if I dont have time to maintain them I'll > > reorphan ) > > > > Now log4j-1.2 is required for ant and jboss-logging [1] can't we > > remove > > these dependencies on log4j-1.2 ? > > Those packages both no longer depend on log4j12 (it might only look > that way to you because of the virtual provides; what they depend on > is actually only log4j 2.x). I have months ago ported both ant and > jboss-logging packages to use the log4j 1.2 API shim provided by log4j > instead of the old, deprecated, and security hole-y log4j12 package, > which is now retired in Fedora. Hi, https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/log4j12 was retired 8 months ago. and I confused log4j12 package with package log4j which also have 1.2- api ! I took disruptor package because: "Depending on: disruptor (151), status change: 2021-04-26 (5 weeks ago)" including ant and log4j > Because I'd rather have packages use > the actually maintained, new version of log4j instead of an old and > dusty compat package. > > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
