Re: [cdparanoia] License field fix awaiting to be merged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 02.06.21 um 17:42 schrieb Neal Gompa:
For what it's worth, I prefer the effective license approach too. I'm
just working with what people tell me. :(

If we just mention the source license(s) in the License tag this means it will become harder to check if some software can depend on a specific RPM.

For example I maintain a package which has a test suite under the AGPL (which is not shipped) but the actual software uses a 3-clause BSD. I guess some users might prefer not to use the packaged library if they see the AGPL even though that only affects tests.

Felix
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux