On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:47 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday, 17 May 2021 at 19:16, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:13 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:19:05AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > ** Package [https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-compat > > > > libsdl12-compat] ([https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960960 > > > > RH#1960960]) > > > > > > I do have one serious question. What happens to: > > > > > > SDL_Pango > > > SDL_gfx > > > SDL_image > > > SDL_mixer > > > SDL_mng > > > SDL_net > > > SDL_sound > > > SDL_ttf > > > > > > ? > > > > > > > Those should all work on top of sdl12-compat, according to upstream. > > SDL_sound has added SDL2 support[1] and then removed support for 1.2[2] > in the development (default) branch while the stable-1.0 branch supports > both 1.2 and 2.0[3]. They also haven't made any releases in 13 years. > > The latest development version of one of my packages, ags, is switching > to SDL2 (from Allegro) and requires a corresponding SDL2-based > SDL_sound. What are the plans for SDL_sound? At least two distributions > have packaged Mercurial snapshots of SDL_sound build against SDL2[4][5]. I can ask upstream about making a 2.0 release that we can package as SDL2_sound. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
