On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 1:42 AM Richard Fearn <richardfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, Note that your queries did not check for BuildRequires, since you did not enable the foo-source repositories. That would require "--enablerepo fedora-source --enablerepo updates-source", or "--enablerepo rawhide-source" on rawhide. > As far as I can tell, nothing else depends on this set of packages: > > $ sudo dnf repoquery --recursive --whatrequires findbugs > Last metadata expiration check: 1:11:19 ago on Sat 29 May 2021 23:00:52 BST. > ant-findbugs-0:3.0.1-25.fc34.noarch > eclipse-findbugs-0:3.0.1-23.fc34.noarch > eclipse-findbugs-contrib-0:7.4.7-6.fc34.noarch > findbugs-contrib-0:7.4.7-6.fc34.noarch > findbugs-contrib-samples-0:7.4.7-6.fc34.noarch > findbugs-tools-0:3.0.1-25.fc34.noarch When querying the source repos as well, this yields those additional dependent packages on rawhide: eclipse-findbugs-0:3.0.1-23.fc34.src (already a binary dependency as well) findbugs-contrib-0:7.4.7-6.fc34.src (already a binary dependency as well) libidn-0:1.37-1.fc35.src nom-tam-fits-0:1.15.2-6.fc34.src ongres-scram-0:2.1-1.fc35.src Since findbugs contains code quality checks, I suspect those three packages could be built without those checks without problems, since they do not require findbugs at install-/ or runtime. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
