On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:27 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 27.05.2021 12:13, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > why systemd-boot is better ? > > 1. Not a bootloader. > 2. Very simple and clean. > 3. Starts Linux kernel directly with EFIStub without any bootloaders. > 4. Can be used with XBOOTLDR[1] on any FS, supported by your hardware[2]. > 5. Has full BLS support. > > Links: > [1]: https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION/ > [2]: https://github.com/pbatard/efifs > Support for other OS for those who like/need to dualboot? Cutting date for hardware that supports it? > -- > Sincerely, > Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
