[LEGAL] License field not match the content of eigen3-devel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I do some investigation of eigen3-devel package and found out that there are some files distributed under the Minpack license:
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMcovar.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMonestep.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMpar.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMqrsolv.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LevenbergMarquardt.h

There is no "minpack" identifier in the License field inside the eigen3.spec. However, Minpack license claims itself to be BSD-like.

1. Should minpack be added to the License field or it is covered by the BSD license identifier?
2. Are we really need to ship files in the eigen3-devel packages that are marked as unsupported?

Regards,
Jiri
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux