On 5/25/21 9:01 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 25. 05. 21 14:29, Major Hayden wrote: > > The culprit of trying to maintain them in one component is that they are > released independently. Maintaining various subpackages with different versions > and release cycles from the same spec file is a huge PITA. > > However, so is maintaining 100 packages. There is no clear win. I'd personally > rather maintain the 100 packages with automatically generated build > dependencies, but I would not say it is a *should*. > > Have a look at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros > I'm not a sophisticated packager so please take my questions here in good faith: Are the 100 individual packages are only useful in this one case (i.e. would anyone else use them for anything)? If not, and the 100 individual packages versus the one large package with lots of spec file complexity are about the same effort wise, then... Should we consider the overhead costs (storage, compute, accounting etc) for doing 100 small versus one large package? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
