Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 15:31 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > W3C stopped maintaining libwww three years ago > > (http://www.w3.org/Library/). > > So, what should one do after finding a bunch of major, but > > non-security > > related flaws in libwww? > > Bribe somebody to take it over and possibly somebody else to package it > for Extras? Yeah, it's headed out of Core RSN anyway - the only dep in core is a obsolete buildreq that's not actually needed. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
