(I've added a few opam devs to CC) On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > opam orphan 1 weeks ago I didn't notice that opam had been orphaned. This package is the tool used for source packaging of OCaml packages under $HOME (https://opam.ocaml.org/). I don't especially like language-specific tools for managing packages, because of the usual problems that have been widely discussed elsewhere and it's not profitable to rehash them again. This is my personal view. The question is if we want to keep this in Fedora or not? ie. As an official Fedora package versus something that opam maintainers would provide themselves as a download. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
