On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:25 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:21:26AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > Can we provide these things as modules and make them available in both? > > > Firefox LTS seems like an ideal candidate, and I can see someone on Fedora > > > Linux wanting the option and if the ELN folks are maintaining a package > > > _anyway_.... > > That's going to be up to the individual maintainers; I don't want to > > sidetrack the ELN discussion too much. > > OK, so let me generalize: isn't "make it a module" the general answer when > different versions of the package are desired? ELN's purpose is to be a staging ground for the next major release of enterprise linux. If this is a package that is intended to be in the non-modular set for EL N+1, then it needs to be non-modular in ELN (so we can calculate the dependencies properly). If it is intended to be a module in EL N+1, then ideally it should be a module in ELN (if we can figure out how to get that to work properly; there are technical issues there that make modules built for Fedora not directly importable to CentOS Stream/RHEL). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
