On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:44:28AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:59 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > No, I don't think it will ever be "fixed". > > ... > > We have in update pungi config a (IMHO poorly named) > > "multilib_whitelist" variable. We can add packages to this and pungi > > will pull them in, no matter if something depends on them or not. > > > > Anyone willing to work on a Change which would allow packagers to achieve > the same behavior by adding a custom Provides to RPM packages (e.g. > "x-fedora-multilib=x86_64+i686")? It would be easier to adjust your own > package rather than wait on a PR approval for the pungi config. Yeah, that could work. I keep hoping... someday... we can just drop multilib. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
