Re: F35 Change: Broken RPATH will fail rpmbuild (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Charalampos Stratakis:

>  I think these rules make sense for RUNPATH, and we should outright ban
>  RPATH.
>
> I'd agree here as well, however this could be a future fedora change
> as I would deem it too disruptive to outright ban RPATH for now.

I don't agree because of this:

>  I think we also should binutils with --enable-new-tags at configure
>  time.

We wouldn't have RPATH after that anymore.


So to understand it better, do you mean globally enabling the --enable-new-dtags?
 
Thanks,
Florian



--
Regards,

Charalampos Stratakis
Senior Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux